On 2015-07-24 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > I tried that one indeed, and noticed it still has misalignments, albeit > very minor. Overall, the alignment does look a bit better than before > the patch and quite a lot better than the originally attached PDF from > 8 years ago, but still not entirely OK. I just attached both outputs in > JIRA, so you can have a look if you're interested.
We are almost there :-) > Unfortunately, the original reporter did not take the time to reduce > the example to a 'minimal' one. > ... > which makes it more difficult to pinpoint the cause. > I am willing to reduce it a bit, but all next week I won't have an access to my PC. > One notable difference with your attachment is that instead of > absolute, resolved page numbers, that example uses fo:page-number- > citation, so it could be related to those. Another possibility is that > the list structure is causing interference. Difficult to say at this > point. I remember there is another justification issue, even with a patch: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2438 But I suppose there is no nbsp character in the original test case so it has to be something else. Jan