Hi! I have been able to track down the offending piece of code in my document by compiling the code partially and considering your observation: It was an <indexterm> enclosed by a <table>, a rather long table, which caused the error.
This seems to closely correspond to your observation that a block spanning two pages gets twice the same id, which offends the unique nature of the FOs' ids. Thanks! Peter Riz Virk wrote: > fop seems to have a bug that if a block spans pages,and that block has an > id associated with it, then fop tries to create two destinations with the > same id, which triggers the error above. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
