On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:22:36AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > It's always difficult to estimate if there will be a problem. Trying it > out will help a lot. :-) Anyway, given that the latest code hasn't > received much attention on memory consumption, yet, there's a good > chance that your document might not work. Having a lot of RAM (and an > increased VM size) helps a lot which you obviously don't really have. > The images are probably less of a problem than the forward references. > FOP has a special area tree model which can serialize pages to disk but > I've only fixed it, not done any extensive tests with it. It also needs > Java knowledge to activate it. In the end, if your TeX solution works, > use it. There's a good chance that you run into the problems you noted > below with bigger documents and the latest FOP release. > >
Sorry to sound ignorant, but what do you mean by "VM size" and "Java knowledge?" I may convert the document anyway if I have time and then report back here and let you know. In the future, do you envision FOP being able to handle longer documents? Paul -- ************************ *Paul Tremblay * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ************************ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
