That's a known problem which, so far, nobody cared to improve. :-( http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/knownissues.html
On 28.08.2006 22:13:35 Evan Goer wrote: > Hello all, > > First, I want to say that I am very happy that > fop-0.92 is moving along. Thanks for moving forward > with this. In general, docs run through the new FOP > look much nicer -- vertical & horizontal spacing looks > better, keep-with-next seems to be working well, etc. > This is great! > > Recently I've run into a strange issue with > <fo:page-number-citation> -- it works fine with > fop-0.20, but the output is incorrect in fop-0.92. > Here's a snippet that illustrates the problem. > Originally this FO came from running Docbook through > FOP, with the option to generate page numbers for > links turned on. I've tried to remove most of the > Docbook cruft, but I know almost nothing about FO, so > please bear with me. :) > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> > <fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format"> > <fo:layout-master-set> > <fo:simple-page-master > master-name="body-first" page-width="8.5in" > page-height="11in" > margin-top="0.5in" margin-bottom="0.5in" > margin-left="1in - 0pt" margin-right="1in"> > <fo:region-body margin-bottom="0.5in" > margin-top="0.5in" column-gap="12pt" > column-count="1"/> > </fo:simple-page-master> > <fo:page-sequence-master master-name="body"> > <fo:repeatable-page-master-alternatives> > <fo:conditional-page-master-reference > master-reference="body-first" > page-position="first"/> > </fo:repeatable-page-master-alternatives> > </fo:page-sequence-master> > </fo:layout-master-set> > <fo:page-sequence master-reference="body"> > <fo:flow flow-name="xsl-region-body"> > <fo:block id="thispara">This is a > <fo:basic-link > internal-destination="thispara">link</fo:basic-link><fo:basic-link > internal-destination="thispara"> > [<fo:page-number-citation > ref-id="thispara"/>]</fo:basic-link> that goes to this > very paragraph.</fo:block> > </fo:flow> > </fo:page-sequence> > </fo:root> > > If you run this through fop-0.20, you get > > This is a link [1] that goes to this very paragraph. > > If you run this through fop-0.92, you get > > This is a link [1] that goes to this very > paragraph. > > Any thoughts about what's going on? (Note: The problem > becomes worse if the page number is two digits, > because the "]" starts to overlay the second digit. I > can provide screenshots of that, if necessary, but I > think the snippet above points out that *something* > weird is going on.) > > Thanks for taking a look, > > Evan Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
