Hi all, Has anyone benchmarked the performance of FOP 0.92 when embedding fonts versus not embedding fonts? I just started doing this with the DejaVu fonts in order to get some more Unicode glyphs and it seems a lot slower. I could quantify this further if you think that's necessary.
I need to know in order to set expectations of the people receiving the PDFs. Alternatively, I could use the Unicode fonts only when I have an unusual glyph in the text (like arrows, etc) since the documentation says it will only embed the necessary characters from a TTF. Or perhaps it using Unicode/CID versus Adobe-defaults/WinAnsi that's the the cause? any pointers appreciated. -arturo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
