Well can you give me an example for another way to accomplish this. Problem is that for now we cannot migrate to the FOP Trunk, so we need to find a solution in FOP 0.95.
Any help is really appreciated. Regards, Rania -----Original Message----- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:d...@jeremias-maerki.ch] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 3:31 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: Keep-together.within-page in FOP 0.95 You can fix this by not using a keep or by a more fine-grained use of keeps. Furthermore, I've implemented partial support for integer values on keeps in FOP Trunk. The strengths are not yet respected but contrary to "always", an integer value allows FOP to break a section if it would result in an overflow otherwise. HTH On 17.12.2008 22:16:41 Rania Saghira wrote: > Hello, > > I am using FOP 0.95 to convert my XML documents to PDF format. With > previous versions of FOP i was able to use the keep-together="always" > to have my table content start on the next page if this does not fit > in the current page. I read that the > keep-together.within-page="always" should be equivalent to the > keep-together="always" in FOP 0.25. This works in some cases, however > if the row is larger than the page the content is overwriting the footer. How > can i fix this? > Any help is really appreciated. > > Best Regards, > Rania Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
