I don't understand your example. I'll post one of my own: <block keep-together.within-column="always"> <block>I use 30% height</block> <block>I use 30% height</block> <block>I use 50% height</block> </block> In this case all three nested block will remain on the same page and will cause an overflow.
<block keep-together.within-column="1"> <block>I use 30% height</block> <block>I use 30% height</block> <block>I use 50% height</block> </block> In this case, the 50% block is moved to the next page if the layout engine doesn't find a better solution, for example by keeping the first block on the previous page and keeping the latter two together. (all assuming those nested blocks are unbreakable for example by carrying a keep-together.within-column="always") HTH On 18.12.2008 11:12:39 Georg Datterl wrote: > Hi Jeremias, > > Did I understand that correctly? > > I have a block with keep-together="1" and taking 30% of a page. On a > half filled page, the block would move to the next page if the > following block takes between 21% and 70% of a page and would stay on the > first > page if the next block is less than 21% (all three blocks fit on the > page) or the next block is more than 70% (both blocks would not fit on > the page)?? > > Regards, > > Georg Datterl > > ------ Kontakt ------ > > Georg Datterl > > Geneon media solutions gmbh > Gutenstetter Straße 8a > 90449 Nürnberg > > HRB Nürnberg: 17193 > Geschäftsführer: Yong-Harry Steiert > > Tel.: 0911/36 78 88 - 26 > Fax: 0911/36 78 88 - 20 > > www.geneon.de > > Weitere Mitglieder der Willmy MediaGroup: > > IRS Integrated Realization Services GmbH: www.irs-nbg.de > Willmy PrintMedia GmbH: www.willmy.de > Willmy Consult & Content GmbH: www.willmycc.de > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:d...@jeremias-maerki.ch] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2008 09:31 > An: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Keep-together.within-page in FOP 0.95 > > You can fix this by not using a keep or by a more fine-grained use of keeps. > Furthermore, I've implemented partial support for integer values on keeps in > FOP Trunk. The strengths are not yet respected but contrary to "always", an > integer value allows FOP to break a section if it would result in an overflow > otherwise. HTH > > On 17.12.2008 22:16:41 Rania Saghira wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am using FOP 0.95 to convert my XML documents to PDF format. With > > previous versions of FOP i was able to use the keep-together="always" > > to have my table content start on the next page if this does not fit > > in the current page. I read that the > > keep-together.within-page="always" should be equivalent to the > > keep-together="always" in FOP 0.25. This works in some cases, however > > if the row is larger than the page the content is overwriting the footer. > > How can i fix this? > > Any help is really appreciated. > > > > Best Regards, > > Rania > Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
