Andreas, First off, thanks for your persistence in this matter.
I do not see the 'DEBUB - FontInfo ... replacing ...' line (nor the others you mention) but this is likely a symptom of the setting of my log level. Let me try to address that first. I'm perhaps erroneously confident in my fop set since I am getting other locally defined fonts in other parts of our system. rjs On 07/07/2011 11:45 AM, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > On 07 Jul 2011, at 19:07, Rob Sargent wrote: > > Hi Rob > >> My mistake. A rash assumption that the example was simply glossing over the >> renderer specific stuff. (Seemed reasonable to me that one might want >> different fonts in different renderers) >> >> I now have the following (partial) config. file and am still not getting a >> clean "Joint". > <snip /> > > OK, that looks good. > >> and I have confirmed that the font files are in my distribution. >> >> The only message I get from the FOP run is: >> [Fop100Stage] [Print Preview Thread] [2011-07-07 10:58:27,161] DEBUG - >> Looking for hyph jar: <longpath>/fop/fop100/fop/lib/fop-hyph.jar!/hyph/ >> >> [FOP] [Print Preview Thread] [2011-07-07 10:58:27,161] DEBUG - >> target-resolution set to: 72.0dpi (px2mm=0.35277778) >> >> where the first message confirms for me that I'm getting the correct fop >> version. > Provided that this is the config file that is used, you should then see, a > bit further down, something like > > ... > DEBUG - FontInfo - Helvetica,normal,400: Replacing Helvetica (priority=0) by > FreeSans (priority=0) > ... > > Do you see a reference like that? If yes, do you also see the "FreeSans" font > being registered a bit higher up? If not, that could mean either of: > - a different config is actually used at runtime > - the FreeSans font failed to load properly > - the FreeSans font is still not the one that Java AWT falls back on for > Helvetica, so the metrics still don't match > > As for the latter, the key is that via the config you _can_ make FOP follow > suit, but you really need to make sure that it _is_ the FreeSans font that is > used by Batik. > Does that font have a narrower 'J' glyph than standard Helvetica? It doesn't > seem so, from what I can tell... > > > Regards > > Andreas > --- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
