Hi Glenn,
thanks for the pointer, your suspicion was correct. With the latest nightly
build the page is rendered like it was in FOP 0.95, which I believe is the
correct way.
Thanks a lot,
Ulrich
Glenn Adams wrote:
I would suggest you check the current trunk (you can use a nightly build if
you don't want to build yourself). There were some fixes in this are since
1.1.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Ulrich Mayring <u...@denic.de> wrote:
Hi all,
please find attached an FO file and two PDFs, which were rendered from it.
One was rendered by FOP 0.95, while the other was rendered by FOP 1.1.
If you compare the PDFs, you'll see that the header "Price (EUR)" as well
as the value "8,888,888.88" jut out to the right in the FOP 1.1 rendering,
while they look fine in the FOP 0.95 output.
The structure of the fo:table is such that the rightmost column is too
small to fit either of these two items, so they have to overflow the table
cell in some way (cut off is not an option here). In FOP 0.95 the items
flow out to the left, practically into the previous table cell, but there
is enough room to accommodate them. Whereas FOP 1.1 flows the items out to
the right of the table cell, which in this case looks ugly.
My questions are: can I get the old rendering behavior back? Perhaps by
changing something in the FO? And who is actually doing the right thing,
FOP 0.95 or FOP 1.1?
Note: in FOP 1.1 these were rendered with the "Complex Scripts" feature
off, so as to minimise variation between FOP 0.95 and 1.1.
Many thanks in advance for any pointers,
Ulrich
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org