See this thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-fop-users/201302.mbox/%3c512d5b3c.8060...@gmail.com%3e
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013, Ulrich Mayring wrote: > Ooops, the newest Nightly Build has changed the Interface of FopFactory > and FontManager. All the setter-methods in those classes are gone. How can > I programmatically configure FOP now? The docs under > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/**fop/trunk/embedding.html#**config-internal<http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/trunk/embedding.html#config-internal>still > suggest the old way. > > cheers, > > Ulrich > > > Ulrich Mayring wrote: > >> Hi Glenn, >> >> thanks for the pointer, your suspicion was correct. With the latest >> nightly >> build the page is rendered like it was in FOP 0.95, which I believe is the >> correct way. >> >> Thanks a lot, >> >> Ulrich >> >> Glenn Adams wrote: >> >>> I would suggest you check the current trunk (you can use a nightly build >>> if >>> you don't want to build yourself). There were some fixes in this are >>> since >>> 1.1. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Ulrich Mayring <u...@denic.de> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> please find attached an FO file and two PDFs, which were rendered from >>>> it. >>>> One was rendered by FOP 0.95, while the other was rendered by FOP 1.1. >>>> >>>> If you compare the PDFs, you'll see that the header "Price (EUR)" as >>>> well >>>> as the value "8,888,888.88" jut out to the right in the FOP 1.1 >>>> rendering, >>>> while they look fine in the FOP 0.95 output. >>>> >>>> The structure of the fo:table is such that the rightmost column is too >>>> small to fit either of these two items, so they have to overflow the >>>> table >>>> cell in some way (cut off is not an option here). In FOP 0.95 the items >>>> flow out to the left, practically into the previous table cell, but >>>> there >>>> is enough room to accommodate them. Whereas FOP 1.1 flows the items out >>>> to >>>> the right of the table cell, which in this case looks ugly. >>>> >>>> My questions are: can I get the old rendering behavior back? Perhaps by >>>> changing something in the FO? And who is actually doing the right thing, >>>> FOP 0.95 or FOP 1.1? >>>> >>>> Note: in FOP 1.1 these were rendered with the "Complex Scripts" feature >>>> off, so as to minimise variation between FOP 0.95 and 1.1. >>>> >>>> Many thanks in advance for any pointers, >>>> >>>> Ulrich >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>>> --------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > >
