I've asked some of the team that worked on those changes to respond to you on this issue.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Ulrich Mayring <u...@denic.de> wrote: > Apparently the setter methods were deleted by merging a > "Temp_URI_Unification branch" back into the trunk. Unfortunately I can't > find this branch in the repository. Also, the supplied examples never > configure the FopFactory programmatically. > > Ulrich > > > > Ulrich Mayring wrote: > >> Ooops, the newest Nightly Build has changed the Interface of FopFactory >> and >> FontManager. All the setter-methods in those classes are gone. How can I >> programmatically configure FOP now? The docs under >> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/**fop/trunk/embedding.html#** >> config-internal<http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/trunk/embedding.html#config-internal>still >> suggest the old way. >> >> cheers, >> >> Ulrich >> >> >> Ulrich Mayring wrote: >> >>> Hi Glenn, >>> >>> thanks for the pointer, your suspicion was correct. With the latest >>> nightly >>> build the page is rendered like it was in FOP 0.95, which I believe is >>> the >>> correct way. >>> >>> Thanks a lot, >>> >>> Ulrich >>> >>> Glenn Adams wrote: >>> >>>> I would suggest you check the current trunk (you can use a nightly >>>> build if >>>> you don't want to build yourself). There were some fixes in this are >>>> since >>>> 1.1. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Ulrich Mayring <u...@denic.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> please find attached an FO file and two PDFs, which were rendered from >>>>> it. >>>>> One was rendered by FOP 0.95, while the other was rendered by FOP 1.1. >>>>> >>>>> If you compare the PDFs, you'll see that the header "Price (EUR)" as >>>>> well >>>>> as the value "8,888,888.88" jut out to the right in the FOP 1.1 >>>>> rendering, >>>>> while they look fine in the FOP 0.95 output. >>>>> >>>>> The structure of the fo:table is such that the rightmost column is too >>>>> small to fit either of these two items, so they have to overflow the >>>>> table >>>>> cell in some way (cut off is not an option here). In FOP 0.95 the items >>>>> flow out to the left, practically into the previous table cell, but >>>>> there >>>>> is enough room to accommodate them. Whereas FOP 1.1 flows the items >>>>> out to >>>>> the right of the table cell, which in this case looks ugly. >>>>> >>>>> My questions are: can I get the old rendering behavior back? Perhaps by >>>>> changing something in the FO? And who is actually doing the right >>>>> thing, >>>>> FOP 0.95 or FOP 1.1? >>>>> >>>>> Note: in FOP 1.1 these were rendered with the "Complex Scripts" feature >>>>> off, so as to minimise variation between FOP 0.95 and 1.1. >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks in advance for any pointers, >>>>> >>>>> Ulrich >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>>>> --------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>> fop-users-unsubscribe@**xmlgraphics.apache.org<fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.** >>>>> apache.org <fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > fop-users-unsubscribe@**xmlgraphics.apache.org<fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: > fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.**apache.org<fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org> > >
