I am wondering if we should name the katello-client repository either foreman-client or just client. I can think of more plugins that need a client package. Timo
> On 2. Sep 2017, at 01:48, Eric D Helms <ericdhe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Howdy, > > As a lead-in to being working towards migrating Katello's packages to the > foreman-packaging repository, I'd like to propose a slight re-organization of > the repository. As well, to seek any other ideas or problems any might see > with the proposal. > > Currently, the packaging repository is a flat structure with all packages > being represented by a directory containing sources and a spec file. When > looking at it, I find it hard to think about them in an organized manner > given we separate by repository into foreman and foreman-plugins (and > eventually katello repositories). Thus, my proposal is to let the packaging > repository reflect the repository organization by moving things into the > following directories: > > foreman-packaging > - foreman > - plugins > - katello > - katello-client > > > Thoughts? > > -- > Eric D. Helms > Red Hat Engineering > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "foreman-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
