On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:15:52PM +0100, Rune Morling wrote: >> With respect to option c), I haven't seen meeuw around for a while, >> but maybe it would make sense to try to get in touch with him and >> hear how his condora project turned out? As I understand it, mkj's >> original 'boots' proposal does indeed map onto option b) and meeuw's >> condora approach maps onto option c). > > Hi,
Hi great to hear from you, > I'm sorry for not being around, I'm somewhat occupied by work/family. That happens all around. :-) > I've had some trouble with bootstrapping condora, some troves (like > filesystem) needs to be installed before every other package because of > the usrmerge (/bin etc. symlinked to /usr/bin). > There seems to be some hardcoded logic in conary to prioritize certain troves, > which just works for rPath trove names but doesn't work for Fedora. > > Doniphon didn't seem to have any trouble with fl:3 though... > > Besides that my patches weren't integrated in conary by SaS (I don't know the > status), it was somewhat frustrating. I'll try to keep this discussion going, will you be able to minimally help out and explain what you did (how and why), Actually I would like to have things rebuild from ground but let's face it until we don't have more people fluent in that lowlevel stuff We should just go for binary or srpm import of a sane fedora base and keep options open to go to more independance step by step if we want and more devs pop in (if that happens at all) We need to quickly line out a way to get to f3 and then having people comitting time in doing the tasks. > gr > Dick > Groeten Mark -- Mark Trompell Foresight Linux Xfce Edition Cause your desktop should be freaking cool (and Xfce) _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
