Excerpts from Michael K. Johnson's message of 2014-03-20 02:51:02 +0100: > I wouldn't say problems that have plagued Fedora. These are > more of possible improvements and we'd like to see whether Conary > groups (etc.) bring these benefits; this is an experiment not a > promise. It's worked for RHEL and CentOS for the past few years > so why not Fedora? But I disagree with coming in and telling > people who have built a successful and widely adopted distro > that they are plagued with problems.
good point. how can we word that better? > And that's not just because I helped start Fedora... > They have a lot of success > under their belt, collectively speaking. The question is > whether we can help even more. right. > I want to be clear that I, personally, simply cannot commit to > implementing any of these rpmbuild integration pieces. Right now, > it's just an interesting (as I see it) idea, if someone wants to > try building something. i have the same feeling. this part of the talk will mostly be just a btw because even as an idea i don't think it will evolve any further from where it is now, so there won't be anything more to say about it. greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life hackerspace beijing - http://qike.info -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net societyserver.org BLUG secretary beijinglug.org foresight developer foresightlinux.org realss.com unix sysadmin Martin Bähr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
