On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Michael K. Johnson <johns...@rpath.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:31:02PM +0100, António Meireles wrote: >> b) regarding fl:2. the problem isn't what is in 2-devel (and 2-qa now), >> is the update path. >> fl:2 has a too old conary (with known issues and PackageKit). So at >> the time of a promote >> from 2-qa to it, groups pre-update scripts need to be wired to (at >> least) erase existing >> PackageKit there (or at least blocking its ability to initiate >> updates) and get some way to >> notify users to do an 'updateall'. mkj do you volunteer for this ? > > So old PackageKit does not put itself into the critical update?
the old packagekit update using update-system. Yes use the critical update first > Does it even put conary per se into the critical update? Yes Only i need confirm looking the code on packagek...@fl:2 > _______________________________________________ > Foresight-devel mailing list > Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org > http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel > _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
