If we're just going to point people to fl:2-qa, it's time to promote to release.
I understand that at this point, PackageKit is no worse than it has ever been in any respect, and in most cases better. It's not like there wasn't significant memory usage before, and several sources of extra memory use have been cleaned up. Perfect is the enemy of good enough. I'd like to understand why it isn't time to promote now. On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:28:59AM +0200, Tomas Forsman wrote: > So no one really wrote why we can't change stable release iso, to > change to fl:2-qa iso instead. > > And as i understand, we don't need to make users to change label anymore > in fl:2-qa or fl:2-devel. > It should use the right installation label from start in -qa and -devel. > > So i hope it's ok to change the download page to have fl:2-qa iso. > Will add some time for it later tonight. > > // TForsman > > 2010-07-02 10:50, Zhang Sen skrev: > > Hi list, > > > > As everybody knows, there are not many new users coming at this > > moment. But sometimes we do see new users, such as > > http://forum.foresightlinux.org/index.php?topic=867.0. And the most > > frequent scenario that happens is like this: > > > > Q: Is foresight still alive? > > A: Yes. But only for devel/qa branches. > > Q: OK. But I met a problem (example: and > > http://forum.foresightlinux.org/index.php?topic=869.0). > > A: You need to install the foo and bar packages from the qa branch. > > Q: ... (system is messed up) > > > > What I have been thinking is that, having the 2.1.x releases available > > is actually hurting us. It presents a false impression about foresight > > to the new users. Users got a broken system (esp. about hardware > > support); and there is no way we can fix the problem for the user; and > > user thinks foresight packages are all old and one needs various > > tweaks to make it work. > > > > What I propose is that, we pull the old releases down from the > > website, and put the qa images there, along with a warning that > > "Foresight is still alive, but there is no releases recently. If you > > want to have a try, use the qa images at your own risk." > > > > Jesse > > _______________________________________________ > > Foresight-devel mailing list > > Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org > > http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel > > -- > Foresight Linux Developer http://www.foresightlinux.org > Foresight Linux - SE http://www.foresightlinux.se > Tomas Forsman - Blog http://www.foresightlinux.se/blog/ > > _______________________________________________ > Foresight-devel mailing list > Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org > http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
