|
I agree with Michael. The bits should be in lock step - this is what our driver expects as well. We don't do test runs either. (Inefficient for boot time)
-----Original Message-----
Steve, why in the world would one bit be off and the other on? There's no enable/disable control for this feature, so these bits must correlate with each other. If you allow bit mis-correlation in your drives, I can guarantee you that most drivers will not operate 48-bit commands and the user doesn't get what he payed for.
Jeff, I test both bits in word 83 and 86, plus verify that the capacity words are greater than 128GB before I enable 48-bit commands in my driver. I don't believe that drivers test-run a command during disk enumeration...I know I don't. Drivers make a choice based on the identify data flags and start sending commands, then clean-up if they fail during run-time.
MKE.
|
Title: Message
- Re: [t13] 48-bit LBA: Purpose of ID Word 86... Gary Laatsch
- [t13] DRQ not being set Fuster
- Re: [t13] DRQ not being set Pat LaVarre
- Re: [t13] DRQ not being set Pat LaVarre
- [t13] o x3F6 DeviceControl def... Pat LaVarre
- Re: [t13] o x3F6 DeviceControl... Hale Landis
- Re: [t13] o x3F6 DeviceControl... Pat LaVarre
- Re: [t13] o x3F6 DeviceControl... Hale Landis
- Re: [t13] o x3F6 DeviceControl... Curtis E. Stevens
- Re: [t13] o x3F6 DeviceControl... Larry Barras
- RE: [t13] 48-bit LBA: Purpose of ID Word 86, bit 10 (vs ... Mark Overby
- RE: [t13] 48-bit LBA: Purpose of ID Word 86, bit 10 (vs ... Mark Overby
- RE: [t13] 48-bit LBA: Purpose of ID Word 86, bit 10... Larry Barras
- RE: [t13] 48-bit LBA: Purpose of ID Word 86, bit 10... Andre Hedrick
