This message is from the T13 list server.





No.
What I said was what I meant.

Refer to these documents:

"Serial ATA II: Port Multiplier, Revision 1.1"
      > http://www.sata-io.org/docs/pm_1_1_Gold.pdf
            section 7.4.1. "Port Multiplier Discovery (Informative)"

"Serial ATA II: Extensions to Serial ATa 1.0a, Revision 1.2"
       > http://www.sata-io.org/docs/S2Ext_1_2_Gold.pdf

Given the <current> (external) SATA specs, a serial ATA and a serial ATAPI
device would have the same poweron signature.

So, we have unique signatures for
      parallel: ATA
      parallel: ATAPI
      serial:    ATA <and> ATAPI
      serial:     port multiplier

Now, it is <another> question to ask if that is proper or not,
which I leave for someone else to answer.

Thank You !!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Hatfield
ATA Interface Firmware & T13 (ATA/ATAPI) Standards Representative
Seagate Technology LLC
   e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   s-mail:  389 Disc Drive;  Longmont, CO 80503 USA
   voice:  720-684-2120
   fax....:  720-684-2711
====================================================


|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           "Elliott, Robert |
|         |           (Server Storage)"|
|         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
|         |           No Phone Info    |
|         |           Available        |
|         |                            |
|         |           10/04/2004 02:54 |
|         |           PM               |
|         |                            |
|---------+---------------------------->
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                    
                          |
  |       To:       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                                
               |
  |       cc:                                                                          
                          |
  |       Subject:  RE: [t13] Documents posted                                         
                          |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Regarding e04127r0, there was a thread on the T13 reflector back in May
2003 titled "Serial ATA signature change from 1.0a to ATA/ATAPI-7 v1r2"
that noticed the problem and (I thought) agreed to resolve it.
Unfortunately it was apparently never fixed.  I agree with your proposed
fix.

Note there is a typo in e04127r0 section 2.3 (in the background
section):
"There was never any intention that a serial ATA device have a different
signature _than a serial ATAPI device_."

It should say "than a parallel ATA device."  ATA and ATAPI need to have
different signatures, as do SATA and SATAPI.  SATA=ATA and SATAPI=ATAPI
is fine.


--
Rob Elliott, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hewlett-Packard Industry Standard Server Storage Advanced Technology
https://ecardfile.com/id/RobElliott




> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 2:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [t13] Documents posted
>
>
> This message is from the T13 list server.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> These docs have been posted to the T13 website.
>
> This one was passed around at the August meeting.
> It is the presentation from TCG
> e04134r0 ? Supplemental info for e04128r0 (Assignments for TCG)
>
> These are new proposals
> e04130r0 - Increased Self-Test Polling Time
> e04127r0 - Correction to Serial ATA Signature
>
> This is an update to the existing proposal
> e04128r2 - Assignments for TCG
>
> Thank You !!!
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Jim Hatfield
> ATA Interface Firmware & T13 (ATA/ATAPI) Standards Representative
> Seagate Technology LLC
> e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> s-mail:  389 Disc Drive;  Longmont, CO 80503 USA
> voice:  720-684-2120
> fax....:  720-684-2711
> ====================================================
>
>



Reply via email to