This message is from the T13 list server.
I have many things to say, but I have drawn my conclusions and am saving them for F2F discussion at T13. I believe that there is an inconsistency in the standard, but I only want clarity, not new functionality. I do not know if BSY=0 and DRQ=1 when the command register is stored is a useful item to document at this point. ------------------------------------------------ Curtis E. Stevens 20511 Lake Forest Drive #C-214D Lake Forest, California 92630 Phone: 949-672-7933 Cell: 949-307-5050 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] My friends and I were on a beer run and noticed that the cases were discounted 10%. Since it was a big party, we bought two cases. The cashier multiplied two times 10% and gave us a 20% discount... and then he voted -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hale Landis Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 1:43 PM To: T13 List Server Subject: [t13] PATA BSY DRQ ERR descriptions from ATA/ATAPI-7 This message is from the T13 list server. Yesterday I said... > This message talks about the BSY, DRQ and ERR bits for PATA. > Summary: As you can see below, everything in these sections of > ATA/ATAPI-7 rev 4b vol 1 is correct. > SO.... > Question (again): What and why are you trying to change this? I was certain someone would have something to say. Hale -- ++ Hale Landis ++ www.ata-atapi.com ++
