On Wed, 23 May 2001 18:54:33 +1000, Ian Wilson wrote:
>Have you any ideas how you might implement more specific no-ERC conditions
>without it basically becoming rules based. I am thinking that there would
>need to be some method of setting the rule not to test and the scope of
>that should be applied. In some cases there might need to be multiple
>no-ERCs applying to a single pin.
I think it would be simpler to have more options for specifying what a pin
actually is and have the ability to edit what a pin is in the schematic. No
need for no-ERC marks at all then. Modified pins should have some kind of
mark to show they are not default.
I would rather specify that this particular I/O pin is being used as an
input than add no-ERC flags saying shorting this pin to an output or power
is not an error.
You could assign proper electrical properties to connector pins for
example.
Also do away with the rules matrix which apart from fixing one incorrect
default I haven't modified in years.
Cheers, Terry.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
* - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
