On Jan 2, 2008 5:33 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sulabh wrote: > > I wouldn't really agree. Not everyone got fed up and moved to Linux. Linux > is still crap on the desktop. But I use it because my day-to-day job is > working on those crap. Is Microsoft Windows better on the desktop? Hell! > Yes.
Yes! you are right... in *hell* , your windows is nice! But, we live in heaven. Haven`t you seen the *effect* of compiz-fusion of linux? Look at that. No one says that, linux is *bad* in desktop. Cause, it`s gui is much powerful and *stable* than others. I am not comparing linux with windows, cause there is nothing to compare there.. windows has no chance to catch Linux`s effect anymore. We ( linux users ) are comparing Linux with Mac only! Google for it... you will know many things regarding this. Even today I'd say Windows is much better and more stable on the desktop > market. The variety and the functionality that Microsoft provides with > Windows is awesome. What do you do? Even M$ employees don`t call their Windows "awesome" like you!!! And *stable*??? If you ever have to reinstall Windows, you'll need the license key that came with your copy. But that string of 25 random letters and numbers isn't always handy. You'd think that in a world where you can't use Windows without activating it, the code required to do so would be a well-guarded secret, but thanks to lax Windows security, a 252KB download--Magical Jelly Bean Software's free Keyfinder 1.41--will recover your license key in a snap. Just download and run the app, and write down your key. Now if only Keyfinder could find my Windows CD.... What I hate about Microsoft is its monopolistic nature. But that isn't just > with Microsoft, Apple is a bigger monopolizer in that regard. I think, Apple deserve this; cause, they are providing a very nice and really stable OS+Hardware. Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Zico wrote: > *You support both??? How is it possible??? I am asking you to find out one > person more who supports both Free Software and Open Source. > * Are both different ? Don`t you know yet? Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: It is not the customization that makes it secure. There are proprietary products which are much more customizable. The availability of the source code is what makes it more secure (or less secure, if you want to argue). First of all.. you are shooting a bullet and just after that.. you are standing infront of bullet. And one thing.. i don`t know why are you calling Mozilla Firefox a *crap* product? Have you even use this? -- Best, Z --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ FOSS Nepal mailing list: [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/foss-nepal To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community website: http://www.fossnepal.org/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
