On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:53 PM, D. Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote:
> We are in the process of converting a 10-year-old project from CVS to > fossil. The original CVS tree consist of 957 separate files totalling > 322,265,419 bytes. The first cut of the fossil repository is > 33,091,584 bytes and after cloning (which results in better delta > compression) reduced to 23,604,224 bytes. Does this mean that sqlite3 is moving to fossil, or are you referring to a different "old" project? If sqlite3 (or any other large project, for that matter) migrates to fossil, i would love to see a post-mortem analysis. :) -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
