On Aug 11, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:53 PM, D. Richard Hipp <[email protected]> > wrote: > We are in the process of converting a 10-year-old project from CVS to > fossil. The original CVS tree consist of 957 separate files totalling > 322,265,419 bytes. The first cut of the fossil repository is > 33,091,584 bytes and after cloning (which results in better delta > compression) reduced to 23,604,224 bytes. > > Does this mean that sqlite3 is moving to fossil, or are you > referring to a different "old" project?
The entire SQLite source history, including sqlite 1.x and 2.x. I hope to go live with the version history later today. Wiki and ticket translation will take longer.... > > If sqlite3 (or any other large project, for that matter) migrates to > fossil, i would love to see a post-mortem analysis. :) This is a rebirth, not a death! > > -- > ----- stephan beal > http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users D. Richard Hipp [email protected] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
