On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:44:25 -0500 >>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Hipp wrote:
Richard> I'm wondering if I should make ".fos" the default instead of Richard> "_FOSSIL_". Would xargs have picked up on the "dot-file" named Richard> ".fos" as it did with _FOSSIL? Would the use of .fos instead Richard> of _FOSSIL_ have prevented this problem? From the darcs' days I recall that its author decided to use _darcs instead of .darcs due to possible problems with Windows OS Not being familiar with this OS, anyone can shed some light on it? Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
