On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:30:53AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Gour <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:44:25 -0500
> > >>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Hipp wrote:
> >
> > Richard> I'm wondering if I should make ".fos" the default instead of
> > Richard> "_FOSSIL_". Would xargs have picked up on the "dot-file" named
> > Richard> ".fos" as it did with _FOSSIL?  Would the use of .fos instead
> > Richard> of _FOSSIL_ have prevented this problem?
> >
> > From the darcs' days I recall that its author decided to use _darcs
> > instead of .darcs due to possible problems with Windows OS
> >
> 
> That was my concern too.  So maybe I make .fos the default on unix and
> _FOSSIL_ the default on windows?

...and set the hidden file attribute for it on Windows.

Joerg
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to