On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Gour <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:44:25 -0500 > >>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Hipp wrote: > > Richard> I'm wondering if I should make ".fos" the default instead of > Richard> "_FOSSIL_". Would xargs have picked up on the "dot-file" named > Richard> ".fos" as it did with _FOSSIL? Would the use of .fos instead > Richard> of _FOSSIL_ have prevented this problem? > > From the darcs' days I recall that its author decided to use _darcs > instead of .darcs due to possible problems with Windows OS >
That was my concern too. So maybe I make .fos the default on unix and _FOSSIL_ the default on windows? > > Not being familiar with this OS, anyone can shed some light on it? > > > Sincerely, > Gour > > -- > > Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected]
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
