On 3 Oct 2011, at 16:20, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:05:13PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: >> 2011/10/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell <virik...@gmail.com> >> >>> What would happen if JSON answers had not 'no-store'? Would not be >>> 'no-cache' >>> enough? It should be up to the json clients though. >>> >> >> Sorry, my mistake - i meant no-cache, not no-store. > > So, as I tested, removing 'no-store' makes firefox remember the form in the > case > of back-forward in history. But clicking to the same url makes firefox still > refetch the page contents. > > I think that's exactly what I want. Anyone against?
Might be best to also add in 'private' Cache-Control: private, no-cache for a more explicit description of the intent of only showing content to the user who requested it. Ben -- http://bens.me.uk/ _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
