On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Ben Summers wrote: > > On 3 Oct 2011, at 16:20, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > > I think that's exactly what I want. Anyone against? > > Might be best to also add in 'private' > > Cache-Control: private, no-cache > > for a more explicit description of the intent of only showing content to the > user who requested it.
That's for multi-user web-browsers, isn't it? I don't know of any. I also can't forecast a meaning for private+no-cache. If ever appears the need, let's introduce "private". I committed the removal of no-store, btw. Regards, Lluís. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
