On 3 Oct 2011, at 17:37, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Ben Summers wrote: >> >> On 3 Oct 2011, at 16:20, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: >>> I think that's exactly what I want. Anyone against? >> >> Might be best to also add in 'private' >> >> Cache-Control: private, no-cache >> >> for a more explicit description of the intent of only showing content to the >> user who requested it. > > That's for multi-user web-browsers, isn't it? I don't know of any.
It's not aimed at browsers, it's aimed at intermediate caches which proxy multiple users. > I also can't > forecast a meaning for private+no-cache. I means roughly the same as no-cache, but allows for older caches. > > If ever appears the need, let's introduce "private". > > I committed the removal of no-store, btw. > > Regards, > Lluís. > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- http://bens.me.uk/ _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
