On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jacek Cała <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there any difference except from being in the repo. I'd say, > "truly" ignored files are not in the repo at all, while "partially" > ignored happen to be although the scm just ignores their local > counterparts. Am I missing something? > That's my point: fossil has to completely ignore one set and only deal with the other set in certain cases. In order to that, it has to be able to differentiate between the two sets of files. It can't do that if they're all in the ignore-glob (which has very specific semantics which users rely upon). In any case, Richard indicated that it "shouldn't be too hard to implement" using existing functionality. i can't personally commit to implementing it in the near future, but it's something i'd like to see at least experimentally implemented. In hindsight, i can't believe this feature suggestion has never come up before :/. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
