If it happens I have some spare time, I'll look on the
{is/if}_selected and will report on any progress.Cheers, Jacek 2012/7/2 Stephan Beal <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jacek Cała <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Is there any difference except from being in the repo. I'd say, >> "truly" ignored files are not in the repo at all, while "partially" >> ignored happen to be although the scm just ignores their local >> counterparts. Am I missing something? > > > That's my point: fossil has to completely ignore one set and only deal with > the other set in certain cases. In order to that, it has to be able to > differentiate between the two sets of files. It can't do that if they're all > in the ignore-glob (which has very specific semantics which users rely > upon). > > In any case, Richard indicated that it "shouldn't be too hard to implement" > using existing functionality. i can't personally commit to implementing it > in the near future, but it's something i'd like to see at least > experimentally implemented. In hindsight, i can't believe this feature > suggestion has never come up before :/. > > -- > ----- stephan beal > http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ > http://gplus.to/sgbeal > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
