Hi, > A sandbox repository with open permissions and with WYSIWYG editing turned > on has been created at http://www.fossil-scm.org/sandbox - please > experiment and provide feedback.
I tried a bit, but I'm not really a guy who uses these things. I like to switch off JS in my browser, and often I am behind a very restrictive proxy which strips out JS things. I did some editing, had an unordered list, then an ordered list, and then was under that list and wanted to insert another unordered list, but then Opera (12.01 on NetBSD) crashed (as in "Send problem report to Opera company"). I used this version today the first day, maybe it's the browser, but in any case it shouldn't happen. Anyway, I would rather like small additions to the wiki syntax (or using another processor, like Markdown which was often proposed) than a wysiwyg editor. * imho the two most important things for documentation, but currently missing in "wiki syntax" are embedded images and tables. Both are not possible with the wysiwyg editor. * I don't see the point in undo/redo buttons - maybe there are people using it, I always use Ctrl+Z/Y for this. * so the alignment: Do people really use alignment stuff in documentation wikis (I assume this is fossil's most probable use case)? * what does the "Remove formatting" button do? * the indentation buttons have a reverted description * why is there a separate blockquote button, which does the same as indentation? * colouring doesn't work for me (Opera behind privoxy) * selecting text, then selecting the colour, etc. above demarks the text and only changes the current line * when doing a newline, all formatting of the foregoing line is lost. If I wanted to do e.g. the whole text in red, I would have to reset that with every paragraph I write. Regards, Julian _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
