On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 08:46:22PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:06:02AM +0000, Eric wrote: > > > > 1) Telling the operating system to delete a file from disk and telling > > the VCS that a file which is in the parent commit should not be in the > > next are two very different actions and I think they should be kept > > separate. > > I'm perfectly fine with there being a way to keep the peformance of these > tasks separate, and I doubt anyone else here has a problem with it > either. What people actually want is a POLS way to combine them. The > suggestion of moving current `rm` behavior to `remove`, and repurposing > `rm`, seems like an excellent way to satisfy both needs. I'd be just as > happy with a command line option for the current behavior and the default > being repurposed as proposed, though some people would evidently be > miffed by that even if they insist everyone else use a command line > option instead, so the command line option may be a suboptimal solution.
I just saw the reminder of the existence of the `delete` command, and if I had thought of that before composing the quoted email I would have suggested `delete` instead of `remove` here. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
