Gour wrote: > > Does it imply that Fossil should not break backward comp. ever in > order to evolve in certain design choices which were, as Richard > himself stated "the use of text/x-fossil-wiki for comment and ticket > text was a mistake." ? >
In my opinion, breaking backward compatibility with a piece of software that is widely deployed and that lots people depend on every single day should never be taken lightly. In this case, since Fossil is a command line tool, there are almost certainly build scripts, graphical wrappers, continuous integration systems, and other automation that would be potentially broken by such a change. -- Joe Mistachkin _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
