Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 31 Jul 2013 20:37:19 -0600: > It might be a little late in the game, but why is it called integrate? > Maybe I missed the discussion about why it is called that---I'll scour > the archives.
After reading the archives it does appear that --integrate, while not quite as descriptive of the closing aspect, is quite representative of the whole operation that is going on. By the way, I like the option. Making it possible to close the leaf with the merge/commit is quite nice. I even tried to trick it by doing: fossil merge --integrate <non-leaf-branch-artifact-id> And it ignored the fact that it wasn't a leaf and just did a normal merge. Nice! Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000000051f9f264 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
