2013/8/2 Andy Bradford
<[email protected]>:
> Does this mean that the merged fork is no longer a leaf at all? If this
> is the case, why assign a closed tag to it?
I never tried "fossil merge --integrate" for merging a fork before, but
it seems to me that assigning a closed tag to it makes a slight
difference. Using "--integrate" makes it impossible for the person
who created the fork to do further commits on the fork. With a
normal merge, the node doesn't show on the "leaves" page, but
still can be committed to. That difference is useful!
I don't know why the timeline doesn't display "Closed Leaf" for
[53ce8d2863], I would expect it to be there indicating that this
fork no longer can be committed to. Looks like a (minor) bug
to me.
Thanks!
Jan Nijtmans
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
