Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:03:36 +0200: > Thanks for your testing and your feedback! It's on trunk now. I used > "merge --integrate" when doing that.
One other thing I noticed is that when merging in a forked trunk with --integrate, it will explicitly close the trunk, which I suppose isn't necessarily bad, but that pretty much implicitly happens when merging in a fork already. Or in other words, a merged fork no longer shows up as a leaf, but neither does it show up as a Closed Leaf, despite the fact that it now has a closed tag. This can be seen here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?f=366f1ae6da39e110 Notice that the fork [53ce8d2863] when merged into [366f1ae6da] no longer shows up as a leaf. Does this mean that the merged fork is no longer a leaf at all? If this is the case, why assign a closed tag to it? Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000000051fafe82 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
