On 04/01/14 18:52, Srikumar K. S. wrote: [...] > This has come up a few times in the past iirc, but I'm not > sure whether there is any resolution on whether fossil will > ever accept to support this and if so in what form it might > take.
I believe that currently most people do this the other way round, by using the RSS feed functionality. Your build server periodically polls the feed for a particular branch, and whenever it sees a new checkin, it schedules a new checkout and build. Using a pull approach rather than a push approach simplifies things considerably as the only server/server interaction is initiated from the test framework, which has to have it anyway. Not having Fossil have to know anything about the test framework is a big win. -- ┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ───── http://www.cowlark.com ───── │ "There does not now, nor will there ever, exist a programming │ language in which it is the least bit hard to write bad programs." --- │ Flon's Axiom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
