On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote:
>
> I would still prefer that Fossil self-tune, however.  While it is true
> that my formula doesn’t give intuitive p values, it is also true that you
> cannot pick sensible d values for a repository without knowing various
> characteristics about the repository.


I think this problem is being over engineered.

The key thing is that Fossil be consistent about how many characters it
displays for a given hash. Currently, at least command is sometimes
displaying a particular has with a different number of characters than at
one other command is displaying the same hash.
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to