On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > I would still prefer that Fossil self-tune, however. While it is true > that my formula doesn’t give intuitive p values, it is also true that you > cannot pick sensible d values for a repository without knowing various > characteristics about the repository.
I think this problem is being over engineered. The key thing is that Fossil be consistent about how many characters it displays for a given hash. Currently, at least command is sometimes displaying a particular has with a different number of characters than at one other command is displaying the same hash.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users