On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:51 PM, paul <pault.eg...@gmail.com> wrote: > It wouldn't offer much control over a distracted programmer, because > your local repo is always going to be under the full control of the user on > the local machine - no hacking required. >
As I previously pointed out, with any DVCS - not just Fossil - any such controls will ultimately be advisory in nature. If you need actual enforcement, you probably need a CVCS, not a DVCS. I don't think it's likely a distracted dev will override or subvert the rules imposed by the hook mechanism. A dev determined to get around the rules is a completely different issue.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
