On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > Okay, how about this design, then: > > $ fossil stash save -m “several unrelated changes” > $ fossil stash apply --partial > > If you say “apply --partial” and Fossil sees that all stashed chunks are > already applied, it could implicitly do “stash pop” instead, since there is > no data loss.
An implicit pop would be contrary to the normal behavior of "apply". Also, if "pop --partial" were also implemented, not popping would be contrary to its normal behavior, though would be a less "shocking" surprise.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
