On Aug 4, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Warren Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 4, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Ron W <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Also, if "pop --partial" were also implemented > > I think “pop --partial” only makes sense if it actually modifies the stash to > contain only the un-popped partial changes, which seems a bit…excessive for > v1 of this feature.
I’ve rethought this. “fossil stash pop --partial” would be easier to implement than apply --partial. It would be insufficient for apply --partial to just learn to recognize already-applied diff chunks as patch(1) does, because the chunks might have been modified before being checked in. Thus, a robust implementation of apply --partial would need to have a list of chunks you previously said “yes” to, so it can skip them the next time. Because pop --partial could just rewrite the stash after each run, it wouldn’t need that secondary storage area, making it considerably easier to write. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
