On Aug 4, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Ron W <[email protected]> wrote: > > An implicit pop would be contrary to the normal behavior of "apply”.
That’s fine. It’s very much a nonessential part of the design. Just trying to save someone a step there. > Also, if "pop --partial" were also implemented, not popping would be contrary > to its normal behavior, though would be a less "shocking" surprise. I think “pop --partial” only makes sense if it actually modifies the stash to contain only the un-popped partial changes, which seems a bit…excessive for v1 of this feature. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
