On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:00 PM, bch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> After I posted this, I thought a Makefile (still to manage actual
> symlinks) would be an improvement over a shell script; you're punting
> on symlinks completely (using VPATH). How has VPATH (or the previous
> shell script) treated you as a symlink manager/replacement ?
>
It works fine.
Of course, we also had to tell the compiler/linker to search those same
directories.
Example:
vpath %.c $(VCPATH)
vpath %.h $(VHPATH)
CCOPTS += $(VHPATH:%=-I%)
And yes, before we started using vpath, we managed symlinks in our
makefiles.
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users