On 6/22/16, Fossil SCM user's discussion <[email protected]> wrote: > The only problem (or annoyance) I see with that is that we don't know from > who the email come from unless we look at the signature at the bottom.
I agree. I just don't know of an alternative. Suggestions are welcomed! > > -- > Martin G. > >> Le 22 juin 2016 à 10:54, Fossil SCM user's discussion >> <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> As anyone who has recently posted to this mailing lists probably >> already knows, some miscreant has again set up a reply-spam bot. >> Whenever you post to this list, the bot sends porn-spam as a private >> reply. Because the reply is private, there is nothing the mailing >> list can do to filter it out. >> >> In an effort to thwart this attack, I have converted fossil-users into >> an "anonymous" list. That means that the email address of senders is >> always stripped. Replies can go to the mailing list only. >> >> This is an experiment. If it does not work out, we'll try to come up >> with an alternative remediation to the reply-spam problem. >> >> -- >> D. Richard Hipp >> [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
