Oh absolutely.  Its just fossil.  For me I can see two benefits to putting 
source on a public site like that.

1 - uptime.  Don’t have to worry about keeping my own fossil server up and 
running 24/7.  

2 - longevity, which is why I asked about that.  If I post some code on the 
internet, my desire will be for it to last pretty much forever.  Nobody uses 
source forge anymore, but you can still go there and download code that has 
been there a very long time.  The original author doesn’t have to worry about 
reposting it somewhere else again later.  Github is a fairly permanent source 
repository, I do not see that going away any time soon.  It will be around for 
decades.  Thus it is a very good place to place code that you want to not only 
work on publically, but just share with the world publicly and indefinitely.

However, I also do not like git much at all.  AT ALL.  You all know the reasons 
why already.  Besides the much discussed flaws with git, I just love that 
fossil has ticketing and versioning and wiki all built into one lightweight 
easy to install binary.  I tried messing around with all the other things 
people are using, and they were nightmare installs with MySQL or Postgres just 
to get started and basically way too complicated for small to medium projects.  
Plus they generally require you to use git…bleh..

Right now my thoughts are that if I create some kind of open source thing or 
something that I want to share with others, I feel like I would want to do all 
my work using fossil for tickets and version control, but then if I want to 
share my ongoing changes on github it would be a pain in the neck.

I guess chiselapp.com is pretty cool, if I find myself needing to do a 
multi-developer project or work on something where I hope others can 
contribute, then that would be better to avoid having to expose my own fossil 
server to the WAN.  I would get the uptime.  I’m pretty sure it will not last 
for decades, so I would have to consider this as most likely a temporary 
solution for publicly sharing the code on long term basis.

Fossil is so easy to install, its kind of a moot point…really don’t need it.  
Except for like I said..the two reasons above and keep your own server off the 
WAN.



> On Sep 30, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Andy Bradford 
> <amb-sendok-1509388468.kfbdnedbbkhghgefp...@bradfords.org> wrote:
> 
> Thus said Steve Schow on Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:43:38 -0600:
> 
>> Who is hosting  that and what is the longevity  compared to github and
>> others?
> 
> Longevity on the Internet seems to  be an often nebulous thing. How long
> was Google Code (code.google.com) around? How long did Source Forge last
> before people started ditching it?
> 
> The nice thing  about chiselapp.com is that it's really  just Fossil. If
> chiselapp.com dies, you  still have your source (assuming  you clone and
> sync with chiselapp.com frequently) and it  wouldn't take much to find a
> new host to put it on.
> 
> Andy
> -- 
> TAI64 timestamp: 4000000059cfe3d8
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to