Anthony wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> Anthony wrote: >> >>> Surely there is a significant difference between an updated version of >>> >> the >> >>> same license, and a license which says the work can be relicensed under a >>> different license. >>> >>> >> Define "same license". It really seems to me you want to >> define a license as being different if it changes something >> you don't like. >> >> > > In this context, for a license to be the "same license" as the GFDL, it > would need to be called "GFDL X.Y" and be published by the FSF. > > > I think that says it all. If that is what you really want, good day to you, sir.
> >> The torturous logic can't >> disguise that the license has been GFDL from the git-go >> and is not departing from that license against the prime >> guardian of that license. That is the bare fact. >> > > > Huh? > See my above reply. Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
