David Gerard wrote: > 2009/2/9 Delirium <[email protected]>: > > >> At the very least, it seems to empirically not be a problem. The GPL has >> included the "or later" language since it was first published in 1989, >> and has since gone through two updates (the first in 1991), without, as >> far as I can find, a single ruling invalidating that language. And >> GPL-licensed stuff has *much* more extensive worldwide commercial reuse >> than Wikimedia content does. >> > > > Indeed. It defies rationality to assert that there is a first-world > country where "or later" is an insuperable barrier. If you want me to > consider it one, I'd like to see an actual case please. > > >
Agreed. Specifically arguing that somebody has asserted on this mailing list that there are jurisdictions where those two words are a problem, is just simply incorrect. Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
