2009/2/7 David Gerard <[email protected]>: > 2009/2/4 Anthony <[email protected]>: > >> Add in the legal questions over the very relicensing itself, and a reuser >> really isn't in any better of a position than they were when things were >> GFDL. > > > There is no legal question over the very relicensing itself. You > trying to spread FUD here doesn't count.
There's no question in the US. I'm not convinced by "We believe that licensing updates that do not fundamentally alter the spirit of the license and that are permitted through the license itself are legally valid in all jurisdictions." (the FAQ) I don't hold much stock by "belief", I'd rather here from somebody that actually knows about each jurisdiction (at least, the ones where we have a major presence, every single one would be impractical). _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
