On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <[email protected] > wrote:
> Anthony wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > >> Anthony wrote: > >> > >>> Surely there is a significant difference between an updated version of > >>> > >> the > >> > >>> same license, and a license which says the work can be relicensed under > a > >>> different license. > >>> > >>> > >> Define "same license". It really seems to me you want to > >> define a license as being different if it changes something > >> you don't like. > >> > >> > > > > In this context, for a license to be the "same license" as the GFDL, it > > would need to be called "GFDL X.Y" and be published by the FSF. > > > > > > > I think that says it all. If that is what you really want, > good day to you, sir. > If you included the context in which I used the phrase you would see that I wasn't describing what I really want, but was responding to a point about precedent. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
